Dingwell v. Cossette et al
| Christopher Dingwell, Sr. |
| Jeffry Cossette, John Williams and City Of Meriden |
| 3:2017cv01531 |
| September 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New Haven |
| Vanessa L. Bryant |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER denying 78 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 79 Motion for Reconsideration. See Memorandum of Decision attached. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 2/5/2021. (D'Amato, Joseph)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 68 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Defendants' 75 Motion to Supplement the Summary Judgment Record. See Memorandum of Decision attached. Judgment shall enter in favor of Defendant Cossette and Defendant Williams. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 9/30/2020. (D'Amato, Joseph)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER denying 25 Motion to Dismiss for the reasons set forth in the attached decision. The stay is hereby lifted and the parties are ordered to re-initiate the discovery process. If the parties believe a settlement conference would be fruitful, they must request a referral to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson as soon as practicable. The deadlines will not be extended to conduct or complete the settlement process. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 06/07/2018. (Lee, E.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
