Abrams v. Erfe et al
| David A. Abrams |
| Scott Erfe, John Watson, John Doe, Trapp and Peterson |
| 3:2017cv01570 |
| September 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New London |
| Charles S. Haight |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
RULING (see attached) granting 11 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint. Pursuant to Rule 15(a)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P., Plaintiff may amend his complaint once as a matter of right within 21 days after service. However, as set forth in th e attached Ruling, after screening the Amended Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court finds that the only two claims that may proceed are: (1) the Fourth Amendment claim against Peterson for invasion of privacy during the March 13, 2017 strip search and (2) the Eighth Amendment claim against Watson for unconstitutional conditions of confinement. Defendants must answer the Amended Complaint on or before August 3, 2018. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on July 3, 2018.
|
|
Filing
10
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER (see attached). Upon the Court's review of Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to 28 US.C. § 1915A, the case may proceed only on the following federal claims: (a) the Fourth Amendment claim against Peterson for invasio n of privacy during the March 13, 2017 strip search (during Plaintiff's transfer to the segregation unit) and (b) the Eighth Amendment claim against Watson for unconstitutional conditions of confinement (with respect to the black mold on the cel l vent). Each of these claims may proceed only against the pertinent defendant in her or his individual capacity for damages. All claims for declaratory relief and state law claims are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on February 2, 2018. (Dorais, L.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
