Payamps v. Berryhill

Payamps v. Berryhill

Plaintiff:	Jose Peralta Payamps
Defendant:	Ancy A. Berryhill
Case Number:	3:2017cv02008
Filed:	December 4, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office:	New Haven Office
County:	Fairfield
Presiding Judge:	Janet C. Hall
Presiding Judge:	Joan G. Margolis
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 18, 2019	Filing 30 ORDER granting 22 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 28 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings for the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling. This is not a recommended ruling. The consent of the parties allows this magistrate judg e to direct the entry of a judgment of the district court in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Appeals can be made directly to the appropriate United States Court of Appeals from this judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(3); Fe d.R.Civ.P. 73(c). The Clerks Office is instructed that, if any party appeals to this Court the decision made after this remand, any subsequent social security appeal is to be assigned to the judge who issued the ruling that remanded the case. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in Plaintiff's favor and close this case. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 1/18/19. (Cates, S)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 18, 2019

Filing 30 ORDER granting 22 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 28 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings for the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling. This is not a recommended ruling. The consent of the parties allows this magistrate judg e to direct the entry of a judgment of the district court in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Appeals can be made directly to the appropriate United States Court of Appeals from this judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(3); Fe d.R.Civ.P. 73(c). The Clerks Office is instructed that, if any party appeals to this Court the decision made after this remand, any subsequent social security appeal is to be assigned to the judge who issued the ruling that remanded the case. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in Plaintiff's favor and close this case. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 1/18/19. (Cates, S)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Payamps v. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose Peralta Payamps
Represented By:	Lewis B. Insler
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Ancy A. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?