Schipke v. Connecticut et al
Mary Elizabeth Schipke |
State of Connecticut, City Of Meriden, Meriden Police Department, Fonda, Busa, Pelligrini, Zurstadt, Jeffry Cossette, Tom Luby, Suzanne Daigle, Connie Schipke, Brian Mahon, David Vega, YCI Niantic Womens Prison, Our Lady of Mt. Carmel Church and USA |
3:2017cv02087 |
December 15, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
Litchfield |
Jeffrey A. Meyer |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 93 ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS. For the reasons stated in the accompanying ruling, all remaining defendants' motions to dismiss (Doc. # 32 ; Doc. # 41 ; Doc. # 43 ; Doc. # 56 ; Doc. # 58 ; Doc. # 65 ; Doc. # 70 ; Doc. # 88 ) are GRANTED. Schi pke's motion for a declaratory judgment (Doc. # 71 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. This order of dismissal is without prejudice to Schipke's ability to file a motion to reopen along with an amended complaint within 30 days, by February 6, 2019, that cures the factual deficiencies identified in this order. Any amended complaint shall comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a) and 10(b), shall use numbered paragraphs to set out a short and plain description of Schipke's claims to relief, and to promote clarity, shall separate each cause of action or claim to relief into a separate count. Any amended complaint should recount facts in chronological order and be free from scandalous or irrelevant information. The Clerk of Court shall close the case pending any motion to reopen.Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 1/7/2019. (Rubin, N.) |
Filing 92 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANT OUR LADY OF MT. CARMEL CHURCH. For the reasons stated in the accompanying ruling, the motion of Our Lady of Mt. Carmel Church to dismiss (Doc. # 21 ) is GRANTED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall terminate Our Lady of Mt. Carmel Church as a defendant in this action. It is so ordered.Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 09/26/2018. (Rubin, N.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.