Rivera v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Catalina Rivera
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 3:2018cv00073
Filed: January 12, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Hartford
Presiding Judge: Janet C. Hall
Presiding Judge: Joan G. Margolis
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum of Decision, 19 Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse is hereby DENIED and 20 Defendant's Motion to Affirm is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of the Commissioner and close the case. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 12/14/2018. (Beyerlein, Alexis)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rivera v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Catalina Rivera
Represented By: Ivan A. Ramos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?