Belgada et al v. Hy's Livery Service, Inc. et al
| Mehdi Belgada, Hormoz Akhundzadeh and Adaniel Dziekan |
| Hy's Livery Service, Inc., Robert Levine, Matthew Levine and Shelley Levine |
| 3:2018cv00177 |
| January 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New Haven |
| Victor A. Bolden |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
RULING denying 123 Motion for Reconsideration: For the reasons explained in the attached Ruling, the Court DENIES Defendants' motion for reconsideration. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 5/10/2019. (Baran, Hugh)
|
|
Filing
121
RULING AND ORDER granting 108 Motion for Voluntary Dismissal; denying 112 Cross-Motion for Attorney's Fees. For the reasons explained in the attached Ruling and Order, the Court GRANTS the motion for voluntary dismissal and DISMISSES with pr ejudice Plaintiffs' Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") claims, DISMISSES without prejudice the remaining Connecticut Minimum Wage Act ("CMWA") claims for want of jurisdiction, and DENIES the motion for attorney's fees. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment for Defendants on Plaintiffs' Fair Labor Standards Act claims only and close this case.Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 2/14/2019. (Baran, Hugh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
