Edible International, LLC et al v. Google, LLC
| Edible International, LLC and Edible IP, LLC |
| Google, LLC |
| 3:2018cv00216 |
| February 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New Haven |
| Michael P. Shea |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached, Google's 46 motion is DENIED.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/5/2019. (Ram, Megha)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, the defendant's motion to compel arbitration or in the alternative transfer venue (ECF No. 28) is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The matter is hereby stayed pending the parties' ; arbitration of the plaintiff's claims. The clerk is instructed to close this case but not enter judgment. Any party may move to reopen this case within 30 days of completion of the arbitration and the case shall be reopened upon the filing o f such a motion. The moving party may also seek the lifting of the stay and the entry of judgment or may seek to initiate further proceedings in this action. In light of this disposition, I deny without prejudice the defendant's motion in the alternative to transfer venue. If the parties move to reopen this case following the completion of the arbitration, the defendant may refile its motion to transfer venue. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 7/13/2018. (Self, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
