Henderson v. Tuttle et al
| Mark Anthony Henderson |
| Tuttle, Blackstock, S. Duncan, L. Michaud-Alvarez, Vicky, Pamela, Barbara Savoie, Carson Wright, B. Liebel, Jennifer Jerome, William Faneuff and Scanning Program - Cheshire |
| 3:2018cv00298 |
| February 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Stefan R. Underhill |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER denying 31 Motion for Contempt; denying 34 Motion for Conference; granting 35 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; denying 36 Motion for Conference; granting nunc pro tunc 37 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Admissions; denying 38 Motion for Conference; denying 17 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 21 Motion for Prejudgment Disclosure of Assets; denying 22 Motion for Prejudgment Remedy; denying 24 Motion for Contempt. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 5/10/19. (Kaas, E.)
|
|
Filing
14
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER. Discovery due by 3/20/2019 Dispositive Motions due by 4/19/2019. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 9/19/18. (Kaas, E.)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 and 20. Henderson may file an amended complaint within 30 days of this Order. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 4/26/18. (Kaas, E.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
