Acosta v. Puccio

Acosta v. Puccio

Plaintiff:	R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:	Kathryn T. Puccio
Case Number:	3:2018cv00532
Filed:	March 29, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office:	New Haven Office
County:	Fairfield
Presiding Judge:	Michael P. Shea
Nature of Suit:	Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 1001
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 15, 2021	Filing 91 ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 84 ) is GRANTED and judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff. The Court also issues the following orders. Plaintiff is ordered to make payment of restitution in the amount of $484,321.48 to a trust to be established for Joseph A. Medina and Lynda Darnell Snagg ($288,385.36 and $196,036.12 respectively). Plaintiff is enjoined from serving as a trustee of any ERISA-covered employee benefit plan. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 2/15/2021. (Gait, Emily)
May 14, 2019	Filing 26 ORDER. The 25 order attached the incorrect PDF document and is therefore VACATED. As stated in the text of the 25 order, the 21 motion to dismiss and 23 motion for extension of time to file a Rule 26(f) report are DENIED. The Court adopts the schedule in the attached, corrected PDF document. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 5/14/2019. (Guevremont, Nathan)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 15, 2021

Filing 91 ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 84 ) is GRANTED and judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff. The Court also issues the following orders. Plaintiff is ordered to make payment of restitution in the amount of $484,321.48 to a trust to be established for Joseph A. Medina and Lynda Darnell Snagg ($288,385.36 and $196,036.12 respectively). Plaintiff is enjoined from serving as a trustee of any ERISA-covered employee benefit plan. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 2/15/2021. (Gait, Emily)

May 14, 2019

Filing 26 ORDER. The 25 order attached the incorrect PDF document and is therefore VACATED. As stated in the text of the 25 order, the 21 motion to dismiss and 23 motion for extension of time to file a Rule 26(f) report are DENIED. The Court adopts the schedule in the attached, corrected PDF document. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 5/14/2019. (Guevremont, Nathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Acosta v. Puccio
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: R. Alexander Acosta
Represented By:	Gail E. Glick
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Kathryn T. Puccio
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?