Ramos v. Semple et al
| Jose E. Ramos |
| Scott S. Semple and William Mulligan |
| 3:2018cv00615 |
| April 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Victor A. Bolden |
| William I. Garfinkel |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
RULING denying as moot 12 Motion to Strike; denying 13 Motion to Re-Open Case. For the reasons explained in the attached Ruling, Mr. Ramos's motion to strike is DENIED as moot, and his motion to re-open is DENIED. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 3/21/2019. (Baran, Hugh)
|
|
Filing
9
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER: for the reasons discussed in the attached Order, the Complaint is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1). The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close this case. Mr. Ramos may file a motion to reopen accompanied by an amende d complaint if he can allege facts showing that the deprivation of his legal envelope violated any constitutionally protected right. Any motion to reopen must be filed within twenty days from this Order. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 4/24/2018. (McDonough, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
