Chase v. Nodine's Smokehouse, Inc. et al
| Nicole Chase |
| Nodine's Smokehouse, Inc., Calvin Nodine, Town of Canton, John Colangelo, Adam Gompper, Mark J. Penney and Christopher Arciero |
| 3:2018cv00683 |
| April 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Vanessa L. Bryant |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
ORDER granting 99 Motion to Compel Town Defendants to Produce Privilege Log; denying 100 Motion to Compel Town Defendants to Produce Additional Information Re: Cases Handled by Defendants Colangelo and Gompper for the reasons in the attached ruling. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 6/6/2019. (Bryan, Kelsey)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER regarding the Court's in camera document review. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 4/3/2019. (Bryan, Kelsey)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum of Decision, Counts 15, 18, 20, 21, 22 and 24 are DISMISSED. Additionally, Counts 14 and 17 are dismissed as to Sergeant Penney. P laintiff's section 1983 personal capacity and state and common law claims for false and arrest and malicious prosecution (Counts 14, 16, 17, and 19), as well as her intentional infliction of emotional distress claim (Count 23) will proceed. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 1/22/2019. (Bryan, Kelsey)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
