USA v. Kaufman
USA |
Zvi Kaufman |
3:2018cv00787 |
May 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
New Haven |
Janet Bond Arterton |
Banks and Banking |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3545 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 82 ORDER granting 79 Motion for Entry of Judgment. See attached Memorandum of Decision. The judgment will be separately docketed.Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 1/3/2022. (Bernard, Hannah) |
Filing 78 Memorandum of Decision, re: ECF Nos. 64 and 65 . See attached. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 1/11/2021. (Banker, Joshua) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: USA v. Kaufman | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Zvi Kaufman | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey M. Sklarz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: USA | |
Represented By: | Bradley Alexander Sarnell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.