Reed v. Roberts

Reed v. Roberts

Plaintiff:	TyJuan Reed
Defendant:	Roberts
Case Number:	3:2018cv00809
Filed:	May 11, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office:	New Haven Office
County:	Tolland
Presiding Judge:	Jeffrey A. Meyer
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 6, 2020	Filing 60 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs claims of excessive force against Lieutenant Wojcik, and Officers Lis, Carey, Wright, DeJackome and Pascarella. The motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to the claims against Officer Aiello and Lieutenant Roberts and DENIED as to the claims Officer Hebert with respect to the decontamination process. The clerk is instructed to terminate Lieutenant Wojcik and Officers Pascarella, Wright, Lis, Carey and DeJackome as defendants in this action. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 2/06/2020. (Gould, K.)
August 6, 2018	Filing 13 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER. The Court enters the following orders: (1) Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim for excessive force may proceed against all nine defendants in their individual capacities for damages. All other constitutional claims are < b>DISMISSED. Plaintiff's claim for injunctive relief is DISMISSED. (2) The Clerk shall verify the current work addresses for Roberts, Wojcik, Aiello, Lis, Carey, Herbert, Wright, Pascarella, and Dejackome with the DOC Office of Le gal Affairs, mail a waiver of service of process request packet containing the complaint to those defendants at the confirmed addresses within twenty-one (21) days of this Order, and report to the Court on the status of the waiver requests on the thi rty-fifth (35) day after mailing. If any defendant fails to return the waiver request, the Clerk shall make arrangements for in-person service by the U.S. Marshals Service on him/her, and he/she shall be required to pay the costs of such service in a ccordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). (3) Defendants shall file their response to the complaint, either an answer or motion to dismiss, within sixty (60) days from the date the notice of lawsuit and waiver of service of summons forms are mailed to them. If they choose to file an answer, they shall admit or deny the allegations and respond to the cognizable claim recited above. They may also include any and all additional defenses permitted by the Federal Rules. (4) Discovery, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26-37, shall be completed by February 2, 2019. Discovery requests need not be filed with the Court. (5) All motions for summary judgment shall be filed by March 4, 2019. (6) Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(a), a n onmoving party must respond to a dispositive motion within twenty-one (21) days of the date the motion was filed. If no response is filed, or the response is not timely, the dispositive motion can be granted absent objection. (7) If plaintiff cha nges his address at any time during the litigation of this case, LocalCourt Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that plaintiff MUST notify the court. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of the case. Plaintiff must give notice of a new address even if he is incarcerated. Plaintiff should write PLEASE NOTE MY NEW ADDRESS on the notice. It is not enough to just put the new address on a letter without indicating that it is a new address. If plaintiff has more than one pending case, he should indicate all of the case numbers in the notification of change of address. Plaintiff should also notify defendants or defense counsel of his new address. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/6/2018. (Zuckier, Chana)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 6, 2020

Filing 60 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs claims of excessive force against Lieutenant Wojcik, and Officers Lis, Carey, Wright, DeJackome and Pascarella. The motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to the claims against Officer Aiello and Lieutenant Roberts and DENIED as to the claims Officer Hebert with respect to the decontamination process. The clerk is instructed to terminate Lieutenant Wojcik and Officers Pascarella, Wright, Lis, Carey and DeJackome as defendants in this action. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 2/06/2020. (Gould, K.)

August 6, 2018

Filing 13 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER. The Court enters the following orders: (1) Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim for excessive force may proceed against all nine defendants in their individual capacities for damages. All other constitutional claims are < b>DISMISSED. Plaintiff's claim for injunctive relief is DISMISSED. (2) The Clerk shall verify the current work addresses for Roberts, Wojcik, Aiello, Lis, Carey, Herbert, Wright, Pascarella, and Dejackome with the DOC Office of Le gal Affairs, mail a waiver of service of process request packet containing the complaint to those defendants at the confirmed addresses within twenty-one (21) days of this Order, and report to the Court on the status of the waiver requests on the thi rty-fifth (35) day after mailing. If any defendant fails to return the waiver request, the Clerk shall make arrangements for in-person service by the U.S. Marshals Service on him/her, and he/she shall be required to pay the costs of such service in a ccordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). (3) Defendants shall file their response to the complaint, either an answer or motion to dismiss, within sixty (60) days from the date the notice of lawsuit and waiver of service of summons forms are mailed to them. If they choose to file an answer, they shall admit or deny the allegations and respond to the cognizable claim recited above. They may also include any and all additional defenses permitted by the Federal Rules. (4) Discovery, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26-37, shall be completed by February 2, 2019. Discovery requests need not be filed with the Court. (5) All motions for summary judgment shall be filed by March 4, 2019. (6) Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(a), a n onmoving party must respond to a dispositive motion within twenty-one (21) days of the date the motion was filed. If no response is filed, or the response is not timely, the dispositive motion can be granted absent objection. (7) If plaintiff cha nges his address at any time during the litigation of this case, LocalCourt Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that plaintiff MUST notify the court. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of the case. Plaintiff must give notice of a new address even if he is incarcerated. Plaintiff should write PLEASE NOTE MY NEW ADDRESS on the notice. It is not enough to just put the new address on a letter without indicating that it is a new address. If plaintiff has more than one pending case, he should indicate all of the case numbers in the notification of change of address. Plaintiff should also notify defendants or defense counsel of his new address. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/6/2018. (Zuckier, Chana)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reed v. Roberts
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: TyJuan Reed
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Roberts
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?