Schachter v Sunrise Senior Living Management, Inc. et al
| Dorina Schachter |
| Sunrise Senior Living Management Inc., Sunrise Senior Living Home Care, Inc., Sunrise Senior Living Services Inc., Entity Doe, John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 3:2018cv00953 |
| June 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Jeffrey A. Meyer |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
154
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. # 65 ). For the reasons set forth in the attached opinion, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. # 65 ). The Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss as to all claims against Welltower, Inc.; as to all claims against Sunrise Senior Living Services, Inc.; and as to all claims against Jaclyn Robbins except for the CUTPA claim (Count Six). The Court otherwise DENIES the motion to dismiss. In light of this ruling, this action shall proceed against defendant Sunrise Senior Living Management, Inc. and defendant AL I/Stamford Senior Housing, LLC as to the following counts: Count One (negligence), Count Three (negligent infliction of emotiona l distress), Count Four (intentional infliction of emotional distress), Count Five (breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing), Count Six (CUTPA), Count Seven (Patients' Bill of Rights), and Count Eight (willful/reckless disregard for Mrs. Schachter's safety and rights). This action shall also proceed against defendant Jaclyn Robbins on Count Six (CUTPA). The Clerk of Court shall terminate defendants Welltower, Inc. and Sunrise Senior Living Services, Inc. as defendants in this action. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 3/16/2020. (Al-Jarani, Y.)
|
|
Filing
122
RULING granting 121 Motion to Strike; granting in part and denying in part the plaintiff's and the defendants' discovery requests set forth in their extensive letter briefing [Doc. Nos. 97-98, 104-05, 113-15]. Signed by Judge Robert M. Spector on 1/30/2020. (Watson, M.)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, defendant's motion to dismiss this case (Doc. # 23 ) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5) and 12(b)(6) is DENIED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 3/4/2019. (Sokoloff-Rubin, E.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
