Cotiviti Holdings, Inc. et al v. Carfi et al
| Cotiviti Holdings, Inc. and Cotiviti USA, LLC |
| George Carfi and Shemika Mosby |
| 3:2018cv01116 |
| July 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Michael P Shea |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1836 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 07/03/2018. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 07/03/2018. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Motions to Dismiss due on 10/03/2018. Amended Pleadings due by 9/1/2018. Discovery due by 1/2/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 2/1/2019. Signed by Clerk on 07/03/2018. (Peterson, M)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-4889125.), filed by Cotiviti Holdings, Inc., Cotiviti USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Blyskal, Joseph) Modified on 7/3/2018 to correct filed against parties (Hushin, Z.). |
| Judge Michael P. Shea added. (Anastasio, F.) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to George Carfi. (Blyskal, Joseph) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Shemika Mosby. (Blyskal, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
