Miro v. Charter Oak Health Center, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ralph Miro
Defendant: Charter Oak Health Center, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2018cv01157
Filed: July 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: Middlesex
Presiding Judge: Janet C Hall
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2018 Set Deadlines/Hearings: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/11/2018 (DeRubeis, B.)
August 27, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth R. Plumb on behalf of Charter Oak Health Center, Inc. (Plumb, Kenneth)
July 26, 2018 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Charter Oak Health Center, Inc. waiver sent on 7/16/2018, answer due 9/14/2018 filed by Ralph Miro. (Burke, Francis)
July 25, 2018 Docket Entry Correction re #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines; Updated Motions to Dismiss deadline. (Anastasio, F.)
July 25, 2018 Set Deadlines/Hearings: Motions to Dismiss due by 10/13/2018 (Anastasio, F.)
July 13, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #5 Standing Order re: Discovery, #1 Complaint filed by Ralph Miro, #6 Notice re Initial Discovery Protocols, #4 Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 7/13/2018.(Anastasio, F.)
July 13, 2018 Filing 6 Notice re Initial Discovery Protocols Signed by Clerk on 7/13/2018. (Attachments: #1 Discovery Attachment)(Anastasio, F.)
July 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Standing Order re: Discovery Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 7/13/2018.(Anastasio, F.)
July 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 7/13/2018.(Anastasio, F.)
July 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 7/13/2018.(Anastasio, F.)
July 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Motions to Dismiss due on 10/13/2018. Amended Pleadings due by 9/11/2018 Discovery due by 1/12/2019 Dispositive Motions due by 2/11/2019 Signed by Clerk on 7/13/2018.(Anastasio, F.) Modified motion to dismiss deadline on 7/25/2018 (Anastasio, F.).
July 13, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Charter Oak Health Center, Inc. ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-4899705.), filed by Ralph Miro.(Burke, Francis) Modified on 7/13/2018 (Walker, A).
July 13, 2018 Judge Janet C. Hall added. (Oliver, T.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miro v. Charter Oak Health Center, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ralph Miro
Represented By: Francis D. Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charter Oak Health Center, Inc.
Represented By: Kenneth R. Plumb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?