Billie v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company et al
| Petura Billie |
| Law of Bendett & McHugh PC, Dominick Neveux, Kevin M. Galin, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and Deutsche Bank Trust Company |
| 3:2018cv01176 |
| July 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Hartford |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Alvin W Thompson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER finding as moot #13 Motion for Clarification. The Court has addressed plaintiff's #10 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. See Doc. #16. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 9/14/18. (Dowie, C)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the Court's Recommended Ruling, plaintiff's #10 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. See Doc. #15 at 6. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 9/14/18. (Dowie, C)
|
|
Filing 15
RECOMMENDED RULING For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, the Court recommends that the Complaint #1 be DISMISSED, without prejudice to refiling. If plaintiff wishes to pursue her claim(s), she must file an amended complaint on or before October 12, 2018. 18 Pages.This is a recommended ruling. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(1). Any objections to this recommended ruling must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen (14) days of being served with this order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Failure to object within fourteen (14) days will preclude appellate review. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Rules 72, 6(a) and 6(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 72.2; Small v. Secretary of H.H.S., 892 F.2d 15 (2d Cir. 1989) (per curiam); F.D.I.C. v. Hillcrest Assoc., 66 F.3d 566, 569 (2d Cir. 1995). Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 9/14/18. (Dowie, C)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam for ruling on MOTION for Clarification and Decision on Motion for Pauperis (Doc. No. #13 ). It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 09/11/2018. (Patel, Ranit)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Clarification and Decision on Motion for Pauperis by Petura Billie. (Enderlin, M.) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam for ruling on MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. #10 ). It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 09/05/2018. (Patel, Ranit)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER: Upon review and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and Rule 72.2 of the Local Rules for United States Magistrate Judges (D.Conn.), Magistrate Judge Merriam's Recommended Ruling (Doc. No. #9 ) is hereby ACCEPTED. The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. #2 ) is hereby DENIED, without prejudice to re-filing. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 9/4/18. (Mata, E.)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Petura Billie. (Bozek, M.) |
|
Filing 9
RECOMMENDED RULING. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, the Court recommends that plaintiff's #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be denied. If plaintiff wishes to pursue this action, she must either pay the required filing fees or submit a new motion that meets all of the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 1915 by September 6, 2018. 4 Pages. Any objections to this Recommended Ruling must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen (14) days of being served with this order. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 8/22/2018. (Dowie, C)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam for ruling on #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 08/09/2018. (Cole-Chu, H.)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #6 Protective Order, #5 Electronic Filing Order, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petura Billie, #3 MOTION to Stay filed by Petura Billie, #1 Complaint, filed by Petura Billie Signed by Clerk on 7/18/2018.(Enderlin, M.) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 7/17/2018.(Enderlin, M.)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 7/17/2018.(Enderlin, M.)
|
|
Filing 4
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Motions to Dismiss due on 10/17/2018. Amended Pleadings due by 9/15/2018 Discovery due by 1/16/2019 Dispositive Motions due by 2/15/2019 Signed by Clerk on 7/17/2018.(Enderlin, M.)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Automatic Stay of All Proceedings/Judgments/Claims Pursuant to Section 11 USC 922 Enforcement of Claims Against the Debtor (s) and Final Judgment by Matter of Law by Petura Billie.Responses due by 8/7/2018 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Enderlin, M.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petura Billie. (Attachment: #1 Affidavit of Financial Statement)(Enderlin, M.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Petura Billie. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Affidavit for Non Corporate Status/Federal Rule Procedure 52 #3 Memorandum of Points and Authorities Introduction; Undisputed Facts, Supporting Evidence, Points of Authority)(Enderlin, M.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
