Chenault v. Summit Security Services, Inc et al
| Deborah Chenault |
| Summit Security Services, Inc and Service Employees International Union, 32BJ |
| 3:2018cv01252 |
| July 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| New Haven |
| Janet Bond Arterton |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 151 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 7/26/2018.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 7/26/2018.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Motions to Dismiss due on 10/26/2018. Amended Pleadings due by 9/24/2018 Discovery due by 1/25/2019 Dispositive Motions due by 2/24/2019 Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 7/26/2018.(Freberg, B)
|
| Judge Janet Bond Arterton added. (Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John R. Williams on behalf of Deborah Chenault (Williams, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-4915195.), filed by Deborah Chenault.(Williams, John) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Williams, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
