Homesite Insurance Company of the Mid West v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
| Homesite Insurance Company of the Mid West |
| Danby Products Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation |
| 3:2018cv01255 |
| July 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Michael P Shea |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER. The #13 motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Defendant Costco's deadline to respond to the complaint is October 15, 2018.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/20/2018. (Barclay, Michael)
|
| Answer deadline updated for Costco Wholesale Corporation to 10/15/2018. (Johnson, D.) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time until October 15, 2018 to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Esty, Miles) |
| Answer deadline updated for Danby Products Inc. to 10/15/2018. (Johnson, D.) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER. The #11 motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Defendant Danby Products, Inc.'s deadline to respond to the complaint is October 15, 2018.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/12/2018. (Barclay, Michael)
|
| Filing 11 First MOTION for Extension of Time until October 15, 2018 to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #1 Complaint by Danby Products Inc.. (Milano, Mark) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Miles David Newman Esty on behalf of Costco Wholesale Corporation (Esty, Miles) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter L. Milano on behalf of Danby Products Inc. (Milano, Peter) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark A. Milano on behalf of Danby Products Inc. (Milano, Mark) |
| Answer deadline updated for Costco Wholesale Corporation and Danby Products Inc. to 9/12/2018. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Homesite Insurance Company of the Mid West. All Defendants. (Rubin, David) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Costco Wholesale Corporation, Danby Products Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *David W. Rubin* *600 Summer St., Suite 201* *Stamford, CT 06901*. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by Homesite Insurance Company of the Mid West, #4 Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 07/27/2018. (Peterson, M) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 07/27/2018. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 07/27/2018. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Motions to Dismiss due on 10/27/2018. Amended Pleadings due by 9/25/2018. Discovery due by 1/26/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 2/25/2019. Signed by Clerk on 07/27/2018. (Peterson, M)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Homesite Insurance Company of the Mid West ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-4915601.), filed by Homesite Insurance Company of the Mid West.(Rubin, David) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Rubin, David) |
| Judge Michael P. Shea added. (Anastasio, F.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
