Wyckoff LLP et al v. VSBLTY, Inc. et al
| Thomas C. Wyckoff and Wyckoff LLP |
| VSBLTY, Inc. and VSBLTY, LP |
| 3:2018cv01424 |
| August 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Defendants ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses and Special Defenses by VSBLTY, Inc., VSBLTY, LP.(Martin, Robert) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert F. Martin on behalf of VSBLTY, Inc., VSBLTY, LP (Martin, Robert) |
| Answer deadline updated for VSBLTY, Inc. to 9/12/2018; VSBLTY, LP to 9/12/2018. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint, Electronic Filing Order, Order on Pretrial Deadlines, Notice, Standing Protective Order served on VSBLTY LP on 08/22/2018, filed by Thomas C. Wyckoff, Wyckoff LLP. (Swedock, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint, Electronic Filing Order, Order on Pretrial Deadlines, Notice, Standing Protective Order served on VSBLTY INC on 08/22/2018, filed by Thomas C. Wyckoff, Wyckoff LLP. (Swedock, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Thomas C. Wyckoff, Wyckoff LLP Notice of Partnership Citizenship (Swedock, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth W. Swedock on behalf of Thomas C. Wyckoff, Wyckoff LLP (Swedock, Elizabeth) |
Filing 8
ORDER: The parties shall file a notice describing citizenship of all members of LLP and LP parties. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 8/28/2018 (Pincus, A).
|
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *VSBLTY, LP* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Mark Paul Carey* *Mark P. Carey, P.C.* *71 Old Post Road Suite One* *Southport, CT 06890*. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *VSBLTY, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Mark Paul Carey* *Mark P. Carey, P.C.* *71 Old Post Road Suite One* *Southport, CT 06890*. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Standing Protective Order, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by Wyckoff LLP, Thomas C. Wyckoff, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 8/22/2018.(Fazekas, J.) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 8/21/2018.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 8/21/2018.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/20/2018. Discovery due by 2/20/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 3/27/2019. Signed by Clerk on 8/21/2018.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Judge Stefan R. Underhill added. (Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against VSBLTY, Inc., VSBLTY, LP ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-4943126.), filed by Thomas C. Wyckoff, Wyckoff LLP.(Carey, Mark) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to VSBLTY, Inc.. (Carey, Mark) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to VSBLTY, LP. (Carey, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
