Huffert v. Walmart Inc
| Carol Huffert |
| Walmart Inc |
| 3:2018cv01481 |
| September 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Janet C Hall |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN: Discovery due by 8/1/2019 Dispositive Motions due by 9/1/2019 Status Report due by 1/11/2019 Trial Brief due by 9/1/2019 Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 10/11/2018.(Anastasio, F.)
|
| Filing 11 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Kenney, Michael) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas B Noonan on behalf of Carol Huffert (Noonan, Thomas) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE re #7 Electronic Service Documents,, Response to 7-1 - Standing Order on Cases Removed from Superior Court filed by Walmart Inc. (Kenney, Michael) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Walmart Inc. (Kenney, Michael) |
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/18/2018 (Lewis, D) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Notice of Removal filed by Walmart Inc, #6 Standing Order re: Discovery, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Protective Order, #2 Notice (Other) filed by Walmart Inc, #4 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 9/4/2018. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removed Cases)(Anastasio, F.) |
|
Filing 6
Standing Order re: Discovery Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/4/2018.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/4/2018.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/4/2018.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 11/3/2018 Discovery due by 3/6/2019 Dispositive Motions due by 4/10/2019 Signed by Clerk on 9/4/2018.(Anastasio, F.)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Walmart Inc Statement of no Pending Motions (Kenney, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Walmart, Inc. from Connecticut Superior Court, J.D. of Stamford/Norwalk at Stamford, case number FST-CV18-6037710-S. Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACTDC-4955823, filed by Walmart, Inc..(Kenney, Michael) |
| Judge Janet C. Hall added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Huffert v. Walmart Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carol Huffert | |
| Represented By: | Thomas B Noonan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walmart Inc | |
| Represented By: | Michael P. Kenney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
