Neilander v. Bendett & McHugh, PC et al
| Darrell Neilander |
| Bendett & McHugh, PC, Service One, Inc., Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, Service One, Inc. doing business as BSI Financial Services and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB doing business as Christina Trust As Trustee for Brougham Fund II Trust |
| 3:2018cv01513 |
| September 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert A Richardson |
| Alvin W Thompson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 USM 285 forms together with Notice of Lawsuit/Request for Waiver of Service, Complaint, OSC, OPTD, Order granting IFP reviewed and sent to USM for service on defendant(s). (Fanelle, N.) |
| Docket Entry Correction re #9 USM Service Papers Sent, removed "Summons" (Enderlin, M.) |
| Filing 9 USM 285 forms together with Notice of Lawsuit/Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and all instructions, Guide for Self Represented Litigants, Intake Forms, Consent to E-File and Motion to Participate in Electronic Filing mailed to IFP plaintiff to complete and return to Clerk's office.(Enderlin, M.) Modified to edit docket text on 10/3/2018 (Enderlin, M.). |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, along with a financial affidavit. The plaintiff has fully completed the required information. He asserts that he is unable to afford to pay fees and costs. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that the plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, the plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Court has also reviewed the Complaint (Doc. #1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and finds the claims are sufficient to proceed to service of process on the defendant. Signed by Judge Robert A. Richardson on 9/24/2018. (Landsman, Halle)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson for Ruling on MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. #2 ). It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 9/11/2018. (Jerjian, O.)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 9/7/2018.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 9/7/2018.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 4
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 11/6/2018 Discovery due by 3/9/2019 Dispositive Motions due by 4/13/2019 Signed by Clerk on 9/7/2018.(Anastasio, F.)
|
| Filing 3 Consent to Electronic Notice by Darrell Neilander (Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Darrell Neilander. (Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bendett & McHugh, PC, Service One, Inc., Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB(As Trustee for Primestar-H Fund II Trust), filed by Darrell Neilander. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M)(Anastasio, F.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
