Taylor v. Berryhill
| Christian Taylor |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2018cv01539 |
| September 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert M Spector |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren E. Myers on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (Myers, Lauren) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Nancy A. Berryhill, Christian Taylor. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Spector. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/24/2018.(Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Christian Taylor Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction (Yelner, Olia) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christian Taylor. Nancy A. Berryhill served on 9/13/2018, answer due 11/12/2018. Service made by Clerk via email.(Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Nancy A. Berryhill* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Olia Yelner* *Pirro and Church, LLC* *50 Washington Street, P.O. Box 844* *Norwalk, CT 06856*. (Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Docs. #2 , #2 -1. Plaintiff has completed the required information. He asserts that he is unable to afford to pay fees and costs, as he has no income and relies on his wife's monthly disability benefits and SNAP benefits, which are less than the household's monthly obligations. See generally Doc. #2 -1 at 3-5. Plaintiff also states that he owns real property, but that property is "about to go into foreclosure[.]" Id. at 5. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 9/12/2018. (Katz, S.)
|
| Filing 6 Notice re: Statistical Information Signed by Clerk on 9/11/2018.(Anastasio, F.) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/11/2018.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing Scheduling Order Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/11/2018.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 3
Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/11/2018. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
|
| Judge Janet C. Hall and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christian Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Yelner, Olia) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill filed by Christian Taylor.(Yelner, Olia) Modified on 9/12/2018 to correct filed against parties (Walker, J.). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
