Peluso Silveira v. Nielsen et al
Plaintiff: Jorge Pascual Peluso Silveira
Defendant: Nieves Cardinale, USCIS and Kirstjen Michele Nielsen
Case Number: 3:2018cv01592
Filed: September 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Alfred V Covello
Nature of Suit: Naturalization Application
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jorge Pascual Peluso Silveira. Nieves Cardinale served on 10/19/2018, answer due 12/18/2018; Kirstjen Michele Nielsen served on 10/19/2018, answer due 12/18/2018; USCIS served on 10/19/2018, answer due 12/18/2018., SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jorge Pascual Peluso Silveira. Nieves Cardinale served on 10/19/2018, answer due 12/18/2018; Kirstjen Michele Nielsen served on 10/19/2018, answer due 12/18/2018; USCIS served on 10/19/2018, answer due 12/18/2018. (O'Neil-Baker, Erin)
September 24, 2018 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Nieves Cardinale, Kirstjen Michele Nielsen, USCIS* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Erin I. O'Neil-Baker* *Hartford Legal Group, LLC* *102 Oak Street* *Hartford, CT 06106*. (Bozek, M.)
September 21, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Jorge Pascual Peluso Silveira, and #2 Electronic Filing Order. Signed by Clerk on 9/21/2018.(Bozek, M.)
September 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 9/21/2018.(Bozek, M.)
September 21, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-4978720.), filed by Jorge Pascual Peluso Silveira.(O'Neil-Baker, Erin) Modified on 9/21/2018 to correct filing party (Hushin, Z.).
September 21, 2018 Judge Alfred V. Covello added. (Anastasio, F.)
September 21, 2018 Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (O'Neil-Baker, Erin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peluso Silveira v. Nielsen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jorge Pascual Peluso Silveira
Represented By: Erin I. O'Neil-Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nieves Cardinale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USCIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kirstjen Michele Nielsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?