Kotapka v. Bridgeport
| Agata Kotapka |
| City of Bridgeport |
| 3:2018cv01660 |
| October 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert N Chatigny |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by John Richard Mitola on behalf of City of Bridgeport (Mitola, John)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER: Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 10/17/2018. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
|
Filing 9
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Agata Kotapka. City of Bridgeport served on 10/10/2018, answer due 10/31/2018. (Bucci, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *City of Bridgeport* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Thomas W. Bucci* *Willinger, Willinger & Bucci, P.C.* *855 Main St., Fifth Floor* *Bridgeport, CT 06604*. (Murphy, Tatihana)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Agata Kotapka, #5 Standing Protective Order, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #6 Notice re Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Clerk on 10/5/2018.(Murphy, Tatihana)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice re Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Clerk on 10/5/2018. (Attachments: #1 discovery attachment)(Murphy, Tatihana)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 10/5/2018.(Murphy, Tatihana)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 10/5/2018.(Murphy, Tatihana)
|
|
Filing 3
ENTERED IN ERROR: ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 10/5/2018.(Murphy, Tatihana) Modified on 10/5/2018 (Murphy, Tatihana).
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/4/2018. Discovery due by 4/6/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 5/11/2019. Signed by Clerk on 10/5/2018.(Murphy, Tatihana)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against City of Bridgeport ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-4997339.), filed by Agata Kotapka.(Bucci, Thomas)
|
|
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to City of Bridgeport. (Bucci, Thomas)
|
|
Judge Robert N. Chatigny added. (Anastasio, F.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kotapka v. Bridgeport | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Bridgeport | |
| Represented By: | John Richard Mitola |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Agata Kotapka | |
| Represented By: | Thomas W. Bucci |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
