Aurigemma v. Costco Wholesale Co.
| Peter Aurigemma |
| Costco Wholesale Co. |
| 3:2018cv01719 |
| October 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert N Chatigny |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Peter Aurigemma waiver sent on 10/18/2018, answer due 12/17/2018 filed by Peter Aurigemma. (Sochacki, Christopher) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to 12/1/2018 to respond to plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 11/7/2018. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| Answer deadline updated for Costco Wholesale Co. to 12/1/2018. (Rickevicius, L.) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time until 12/01/2018 to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Costco Wholesale Co.. (Esty, Miles) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Miles David Newman Esty on behalf of Costco Wholesale Co. (Esty, Miles) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Costco Wholesale Co.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Christopher J. Sochacki* *Cramer & Anderson - Litchfield* *46 West St., P.O. Box 278* *Litchfield, CT 06759*. (Murphy, Tatihana) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Standing Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Peter Aurigemma Signed by Clerk on 10/16/2018.(Murphy, Tatihana) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 10/16/2018.(Murphy, Tatihana)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 10/16/2018.(Murphy, Tatihana)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/15/2018. Discovery due by 4/17/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 5/22/2019. Signed by Clerk on 10/16/18.(Murphy, Tatihana)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5009769.), filed by Peter Aurigemma.(Sochacki, Christopher) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Costco Wholesale Co.. (Sochacki, Christopher) |
| Judge Robert N. Chatigny added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Aurigemma v. Costco Wholesale Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Costco Wholesale Co. | |
| Represented By: | Miles David Newman Esty |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Peter Aurigemma | |
| Represented By: | Christopher J. Sochacki |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
