James v. USA et al
Plaintiff: Amber James
Defendant: United States Postal Service and USA
Case Number: 3:2018cv01772
Filed: October 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Michael P Shea
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2018 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amber James. All Defendants. (Moore, Garrett)
October 31, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE by Amber James CIVIL COVER SHEET (Moore, Garrett)
October 31, 2018 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *USA, United States Postal Service* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Garrett M. Moore* *Moore, O'Brien, and Foti* *891 Straits Turnpike* *Middlebury, CT 06762*. (Shafer, J.)
October 31, 2018 Request for Clerk to issue summons as to USA and United States Postal Service. (Shafer, J.)
October 30, 2018 Filing fee received from Moore, OBrien and Foti: $ 400.00, receipt number CTXH00014783 (Hushin, Z.)
October 29, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by Amber James, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 10/29/2018. (Peterson, M)
October 29, 2018 Docket Annotation: This case was opened on 10/26/18 without paying the filing fee or filing a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Payment was requested via E-mail on 10/26/18. (Hushin, Z.)
October 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 10/26/2018. (Peterson, M)
October 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 10/26/2018. (Peterson, M)
October 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/25/2018. Discovery due by 4/27/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 6/1/2019. Signed by Clerk on 10/26/2018. (Peterson, M)
October 26, 2018 Judge Michael P. Shea added. (Anastasio, F.)
October 26, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Amber James.(Moore, Garrett) Modified on 10/26/2018 to correct party (Hushin, Z.).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James v. USA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber James
Represented By: Garrett M. Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Postal Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?