McCaskill v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Kenny Lee McCaskill |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2018cv01777 |
| October 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 dc |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE RE: STATISTICAL INFORMATION Signed by Clerk on 10/26/2018.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 10/26/2018.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 10/26/2018.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 10/26/2018. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Judge Stefan R Underhill added. (Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kenny Lee McCaskill. (Pierre Pierre, Eddy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Kenny Lee McCaskill against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Kenny Lee McCaskill. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Pierre Pierre, Eddy) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Commissioner of Social Security. (Pierre Pierre, Eddy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
