Schifano v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Joseph Schifano
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2018cv01806
Filed: November 2, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Sarah A L Merriam
Referring Judge: Stefan R Underhill
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2018 Filing 13 Notice re: Consent to Magistrate Judge by Joseph Schifano (Anastasio, F.)
December 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 REMINDER: Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 12/12/2018. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
December 11, 2018 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Heetano Shamsoondar on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (Shamsoondar, Heetano)
November 6, 2018 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joseph Schifano. Nancy A. Berryhill served on 11/6/2018, answer due 1/5/2019. Service made by Clerk via email. (Fazekas, J.)
November 6, 2018 Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Nancy A. Berryhill* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. *Joseph Schifano* *441 Main St.* *TRLR 1005* *East Hartford, CT 06118*. (Fazekas, J.)
November 6, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES Signed by Clerk on 11/6/2018.(Fazekas, J.)
November 2, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE RE: STATISTICAL INFORMATION Signed by Clerk on 11/2/2018.(Fazekas, J.)
November 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 11/2/2018.(Fazekas, J.)
November 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 11/2/2018.(Fazekas, J.)
November 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 11/2/2018. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
November 2, 2018 Filing 3 Appearance Self-Represented Party by Joseph Schifano. (Fazekas, J.)
November 2, 2018 Filing 2 Appearance Self Represented Party by Joseph Schifano. (Fazekas, J.)
November 2, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill, filed by Joseph Schifano. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fazekas, J.)
November 2, 2018 Filing fee received from Joseph A. Schifano: $400.00, receipt number CTXH00014796. (Fazekas, J.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schifano v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Heetano Shamsoondar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Schifano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?