Diana v. Walmart, Inc. et al
| Mary Lou Diana |
| Walmart, Inc. and Walmart Stores East, LP |
| 3:2018cv01811 |
| November 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Warren W Eginton |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Case remanded to State Court Judicial District of New Haven. (Imbriani, Susan) |
| JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 12
ORDER granting, upon review and absent objection, #8 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 12/11/18. (Ladd-Smith, I.)
|
| Filing 11 Statement of Material Facts re #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court Declaration of Plaintiff's Counsel in Support of Motion filed by Mary Lou Diana. (Ciardiello, Steven) |
| Filing 10 Statement of Material Facts re #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court Declaration of Plaintiff filed by Mary Lou Diana. (Ciardiello, Steven) |
| Filing 9 Memorandum in Support re #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Mary Lou Diana. (Ciardiello, Steven) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Mary Lou Diana.Responses due by 12/10/2018 (Ciardiello, Steven) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Notice of Appearance filed by Janice D. Lai on behalf of Walmart Stores East, LP, Walmart, Inc., #1 Notice of Removal filed by Walmart Stores East, LP, Walmart, Inc., #6 Standing Protective Order, #5 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Statement of No Pending Motions filed by Walmart Stores East, LP, Walmart, Inc., #4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 11/5/2018. (Attachments: #1 Removal Standing Order)(Fazekas, J.) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 11/2/2018.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Warren W. Eginton on 11/2/2018.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 1/1/2019. Discovery due by 5/4/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 6/8/2019. Signed by Clerk on 11/2/2018.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Walmart Stores East, LP, Walmart, Inc. Statement of No Pending Motions (Lai, Janice) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Janice D. Lai on behalf of Walmart Stores East, LP, Walmart, Inc. (Lai, Janice) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Walmart, Inc., Walmart Stores East, LP from New Haven Superior Court, case number NNH-CV18-6085555-S. Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACTDC-5034582, filed by Walmart, Inc., Walmart Stores East, LP.(Lai, Janice) |
| Judge Warren W. Eginton added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
