Miller v. Brown
Plaintiff: Davon Miller
Defendant: Brown
Case Number: 3:2018cv01823
Filed: November 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey A Meyer
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 2, 2019 Filing 12 JUDGMENT Dismissing the Petition for Writ of Mandamus. For Appeal Forms please go to the following website: http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms/appeals_forms Signed by Clerk on 01/02/19. (Barry, Donna)
January 2, 2019 Filing 11 Docket Entry Modified to add the correct event re #9 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. (Gutierrez, Y.)
January 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER denying #1 Motion for Writ of Mandamus. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 1/2/2019. (Gutierrez, Y.)
January 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS: For the reasons stated in the attached ruling, this action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b) for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 1/2/2018. (Sokoloff-Rubin, E.) Modified on 1/2/2019 (Gutierrez, Y.).
November 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 11/29/2018. (Payton, R.)
November 26, 2018 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Davon Miller. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(Barry, Donna)
November 13, 2018 Filing 5 Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Please submit the attached Prisoner's IFP application which is being sent to you via U.S. mail. If insufficiency not corrected Dismissal due by 12/4/2018 Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 11/13/2018.(Payton, R.)
November 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Prisoner E-Filing Standing Order Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 11/5/2018.(Fanelle, N.)
November 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 11/5/2018. (Fanelle, N.)
November 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 11/5/2018. (Fanelle, N.)
November 5, 2018 Filing 2 PRISCS MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Davon Miller. (Fanelle, N.)
November 5, 2018 Filing 1 PRISCS MOTION for Writ of Mandamus by Davon Miller. (Fanelle, N.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Davon Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?