USA v. Rimer
| USA |
| Alec A Rimer and Alec A. Rimer |
| 3:2018cv01850 |
| November 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Alfred V Covello |
| Contract: Recovery Student Loan |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Alec A. Rimer* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Christine L. Sciarrino* *U.S. Attorney's Office-NH* *157 Church St., 25th Floor* *New Haven, CT 06510*. (Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by USA, and Request to Issue Summons. Signed by Clerk on 11/13/2018.(Bozek, M.) |
Filing 2
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 11/10/2018.(Bozek, M.)
|
| Judge Alfred V. Covello added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Alec A Rimer, filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Sciarrino, Christine) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Alec A Rimer. (Sciarrino, Christine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
