Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Tae's Lounge, LLC et al
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. |
Ronald D Jones, Tae's Lounge, LLC and Tae's Lounge, LLC doing business as Tae's Lounge |
3:2018cv01893 |
November 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Victor A Bolden |
Cable/Satellite TV |
47 U.S.C. § 0553 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Ronald D Jones, Tae's Lounge, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Michael Lincoln Chambers, Jr* *Law Office of Michael Chambers Jr.* *Bushnell on the Park, 100 Wells St., Suite 2C* *Hartford, CT 06103*. (Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Standing Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc., #3 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 11/20/2018.(Fazekas, J.) |
|
|
|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ronald D Jones, Tae's Lounge, LLC ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5057656.), filed by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Chambers, Michael) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Ronald D Jones, Tae's Lounge, LLC. (Chambers, Michael) |
Judge Victor A. Bolden added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.