Clark v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Raymond Francis Clark, Jr.
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2018cv01903
Filed: November 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Robert M Spector
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: The Government having filed the administrative record, the court hereby enters the following Scheduling Order: Plaintiff shall file a motion to reverse and/or remand and a supporting memorandum of law on or before MARCH 18, 2019. On or before MARCH 18, 2019 , plaintiff shall file, as a separate document, a statement of material facts consisting of numbered paragraphs and supported by specific page citations to the Certified Administrative Record, as shall comply with the Standing Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 5) in this case. Defendant shall file a motion to affirm or a motion for voluntary remand on or before MAY 17, 2019. On or before MAY 17, 2019, defendant shall file a responsive statement of facts as set forth in the Standing Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 5) entered in this case. Plaintiff may file a reply brief pursuant to Local Rule 7(d) and may file a response to defendants statement of facts on or before MAY 24, 2019. Prior to the filing of any dispositive motions, counsel are encouraged to confer regarding the merits of the case in an effort to determine whether a reversal and voluntary remand are appropriate. The court reminds the parties of the previously filed Standing Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 5) which sets forth page limits and form and content requirements for motions and supporting memoranda. The parties should avoid boilerplate discussions of the governing legal standards as the court is familiar with the standard of review and the sequential evaluation process employed in the analysis of Social Security disability applications. The parties should focus on informing the court of relevant and controlling legal authority and applying it to the facts of this case. Motions filed by the parties must comply with the requirements set forth above and in the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to comply may result in denial of the motion.Requests for extensions of these deadlines are discouraged and, unless unusual circumstances dictate otherwise, counsel should not seek an extension of greater than 30 days. Any motion for extension of a deadline must include a showing of good cause as required by Local Rule 7(b)(2) and must be filed at least three days before the existing deadline. SO ORDERED Signed by Judge Robert M. Spector on 1/16/2019.(Watson, M.)
January 15, 2019 Filing 9 Social Security Transcripts by Social Security Administration. (Brown, David)
December 4, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by David L. Brown on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (Brown, David)
November 27, 2018 Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Nancy A. Berryhill, Raymond Francis Clark, Jr. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Spector. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 11/27/2018.(Anastasio, F.)
November 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 11/21/2018.(Anastasio, F.)
November 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Standing Scheduling Order Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 11/21/2018.(Anastasio, F.)
November 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 11/21/2018. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
November 21, 2018 Filing 3 Notice re: Consent to Magistrate Judge by Raymond Francis Clark, Jr (Anastasio, F.)
November 21, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ivan Michael Katz on behalf of Raymond Francis Clark, Jr (Anastasio, F.)
November 21, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill, filed by Raymond Francis Clark, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Anastasio, F.)
November 21, 2018 Filing fee received from Law Office of Ivan M. Katz: $ 400.00, receipt number CTXN00018208 (Anastasio, F.)
November 21, 2018 Answer deadline updated for Nancy A. Berryhill to 1/20/2019. (Anastasio, F.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clark v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond Francis Clark, Jr.
Represented By: Ivan Michael Katz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: David L. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?