Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
| Strike 3 Holdings, LLC |
| John Doe |
| 3:2018cv01938 |
| November 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Janet Bond Arterton |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Docket Entry Correction re #9 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief - Corrected pdf added. (Freberg, B) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 12/18/18. (Tooker, A.) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/18/2018: #1 REPLACEMENT PDF) (Freberg, B).
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Serve a Third Party Subpoena Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC.Responses due by 1/3/2019 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Text of Proposed Order)(James, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #6 Protective Order, #1 Complaint filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, #5 Docket Annotation Signed by Clerk on 11/29/18.(Barry, Donna) |
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 11/28/18.(Barry, Donna) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/29/2018: #1 Replacement PDF) (Barry, Donna). Modified on 11/29/2018 (Barry, Donna).
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 11/28/18.(Barry, Donna)
|
| Filing 5 Docket Entry Correction replaced PDF of #4 Electronic Filing Order. (Barry, Donna) |
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 1/27/2019 Discovery due by 5/30/2019 Dispositive Motions due by 7/4/2019 Signed by Clerk on 11/28/18.(Barry, Donna)
|
| Judge Janet Bond Arterton added. (Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC identifying Corporate Parent General Media Systems, LLC for Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (James, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5066249.), filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Cover Sheet)(James, Jacqueline) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Doe | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jacqueline M. James |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
