USA v. $26,480.00 in United States Currency et al
USA |
$26,480.00 in United States Currency and $4,000 in United States Currency |
Wilson Algarin and Claudia Velandia |
3:2018cv01962 |
December 3, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Victor A Bolden |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Protective Order, #3 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 12/4/2018.(Perez, J.) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 12/3/2018.(Perez, J.) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 12/3/2018.(Perez, J.) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 2/1/2019; Discovery due by 6/4/2019; Dispositive Motions due by 7/9/2019. Signed by Clerk on 12/3/2018.(Perez, J.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against $26,480.00 in United States Currency, $4,000 in United States Currency, filed by USA.(Sullivan, David) |
Judge Victor A. Bolden added. (Anastasio, F.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.