Upshaw v. Newell et al
Plaintiff: Tyrone Upshaw
Defendant: Mark Rostkowski, M Dimanno and James Newell
Case Number: 3:2018cv01994
Filed: December 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Vanessa L Bryant
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 1/18/2018. (Payton, R.)
January 14, 2019 Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against M Dimanno, James Newell, Mark Rostkowski, filed by Tyrone Upshaw.(Payton, R.)
January 14, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tyrone Upshaw. (Payton, R.)
December 20, 2018 Filing 7 EXHIBIT A, by Tyrone Upshaw re #3 Standing Protective Order. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Velez, F.)
December 17, 2018 Filing 6 Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. You must submit the attached Prisoner's IFP application which is being sent to you via U.S. mail. If insufficiency not corrected Dismissal due by 1/7/2019 Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 12/17/2018.(Payton, R.)
December 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 12/06/2018.(Mendez, D)
December 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Prisoner E-Filing Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 12/06/2018.(Mendez, D)
December 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 12/06/2018.(Mendez, D)
December 6, 2018 Filing 2 PRISCS MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tyrone Upshaw. (Mendez, D)
December 6, 2018 Filing 1 PRISCS COMPLAINT against M Dimanno, James Newell, Mark Rostkowski, filed by Tyrone Upshaw. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(Mendez, D)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Upshaw v. Newell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyrone Upshaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Rostkowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M Dimanno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Newell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?