Stellar J Corporation v. Macton Corporation
| Stellar J Corporation |
| The Macton Corporation and Macton Corporation |
| 3:2018cv01999 |
| December 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Jeffrey A Meyer |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER RE RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT. Defendant Macton shall file any objection or other response to the motion for leave to file an amended complaint by February 6, 2019. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 01/31/19. (Barry, Donna)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #12 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint and to Join Party Defendant. Responses due by 2/6/2019 (Barry, Donna) |
| Filing 13 Memorandum in Support re #12 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint and to Join Party Defendant filed by Stellar J Corporation. (Jensen, Benjamin) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint and to Join Party Defendant by Stellar J Corporation.Responses due by 2/20/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Amended Complaint)(Jensen, Benjamin) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin C. Jensen on behalf of Stellar J Corporation (Jensen, Benjamin) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stellar J Corporation. Stellar J Corporation served on 12/11/2018, answer due 1/1/2019. (Barrack, Robert) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Stellar J Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Stellar J Enterprises, Inc. for Stellar J Corporation. (Barrack, Robert) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter E. Strniste, Jr on behalf of Stellar J Corporation (Strniste, Peter) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS REISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Macton Corporation* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Robert M. Barrack* *Robinson & Cole, LLP* *280 Trumbull St.* *Hartford, CT 06103*. (Barry, Donna) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Macton Corporation* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Robert M. Barrack* *Robinson & Cole, LLP* *280 Trumbull St.* *Hartford, CT 06103*. (Barry, Donna) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Protective Order, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by Stellar J Corporation. Signed by Clerk on 12/07/18.(Barry, Donna) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 12/06/18.(Barry, Donna)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 12/06/18.(Barry, Donna)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 2/4/2019, Discovery due by 6/7/2019, Dispositive Motions due by 7/12/2019. Signed by Clerk on 12/06/18.(Barry, Donna)
|
| Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Macton Corporation ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5077160.), filed by Stellar J Corporation.(Barrack, Robert) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to The Macton Corporation. (Barrack, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
