Chaney v. USA et al
Carla Denise Chaney |
Donald Trump and USA |
Joshua James Johnson and Christopher Juan Chaney |
3:2018cv02019 |
December 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Kari A Dooley |
Sarah A L Merriam |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing 10 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Joshua James Johnson. (Bozek, M.) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Joshua James Johnson. (Bozek, M.) |
Filing 8 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Christopher Juan Chaney. (Bozek, M.) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Christopher Juan Chaney. (Bozek, M.) |
Filing 6 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Carla Denise Chaney. (Bozek, M.) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Carla Denise Chaney. (Bozek, M.) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Order to Participate in Electronic Filing by Carla Denise Chaney. (Bozek, M.) |
Filing 3 Appearance Self Represented Party by Carla Denise Chaney. (Bozek, M.) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Carla Denise Chaney. (Bozek, M.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Donald Trump, USA, filed by Carla Denise Chaney. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bozek, M.) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to USA. (Bozek, M.) Modified on 12/12/2018 to correct file date (Bozek, M.). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.