Cintron v. East Haven Town Hall
Plaintiff: Vicky Cintron
Defendant: East Haven Town Hall
Case Number: 3:2018cv02076
Filed: December 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Victor A Bolden
Referring Judge: William I Garfinkel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2019 Filing 12 JUDGMENT entered in favor of East Haven Town Hall against Vicky Cintron.For Appeal Forms please go to the following website: http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms/appeals_forms Signed by Clerk on 1/24/2019.(Perez, J.)
January 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER adopting #9 Recommended Ruling; finding as moot #10 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 1/22/2019. (Washington, Gregory)
January 11, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Vicky Cintron. (Perez, J.)
January 7, 2019 Filing 9 RECOMMENDED RULING : For the reasons set forth in the attached Recommended Ruling, the Undersigned recommends that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(e)(2)(B). This is a Recommended Ruling. Any objection must be filed within 14 days after service. Objections due by 1/21/2019. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 1/7/19.(Cates, S)
January 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis based upon the financial affidavit provided, but for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Ruling filed herewith, the Undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(e)(2)(b). Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 1/7/19. (Cates, S)
December 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge William I. Garfinkel for #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 12/19/2018.(Washington, Gregory)
December 18, 2018 Filing 6 MANUALLY FILED CD EXHIBIT - by Vicky Cintron re #1 Complaint. Forwarded to Chambers. (Anastasio, F.)
December 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 12/18/2018.(Anastasio, F.)
December 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 12/18/2018.(Anastasio, F.)
December 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 2/16/2019 Discovery due by 6/19/2019 Dispositive Motions due by 7/24/2019 Signed by Clerk on 12/18/2018.(Anastasio, F.)
December 18, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Vicky Cintron. (Anastasio, F.)
December 18, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against East Haven Town Hall, filed by Vicky Cintron.(Anastasio, F.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cintron v. East Haven Town Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vicky Cintron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: East Haven Town Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?