Lavatec Laundry Technology GmbH v. Maxi-Press Elastomeric, Inc. et al
Lavatec Laundry Technology GmbH |
Voss Laundry Solutions, Inc., Hector Alejandro, Wieap Beheer B.V., Reiner Schmelcher, Maxi-Press Elastomeric, Inc., Finlog SA and Voss Laundry Solutions Inc. |
3:2018cv02108 |
December 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Janet Bond Arterton |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 1051 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Answer deadline updated for Hector Alejandro to 3/1/2019; Maxi-Press Elastomeric, Inc. to 3/1/2019; Reiner Schmelcher to 3/1/2019. (Freberg, B) |
|
Filing 15 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until March 1, 2019 to Respond to the Complaint #1 Complaint by Hector Alejandro, Maxi-Press Elastomeric, Inc., Reiner Schmelcher. (Carberry, John) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Attorney(s) Moritz C. Schumann to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $75 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-5134602) by Hector Alejandro, Maxi-Press Elastomeric, Inc., Reiner Schmelcher. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Ex. A)(Carberry, John) |
Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Maxi-Press Elastomeric, Inc.. (Carberry, John) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by John F. Carberry on behalf of Hector Alejandro, Maxi-Press Elastomeric, Inc., Reiner Schmelcher (Carberry, John) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lavatec Laundry Technology GmbH. Hector Alejandro served on 1/10/2019, answer due 1/31/2019; Maxi-Press Elastomeric, Inc. served on 1/10/2019, answer due 1/31/2019; Reiner Schmelcher served on 1/10/2019, answer due 1/31/2019. (Shufrin, David) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lavatec Laundry Technology GmbH. Voss Laundry Solutions Inc. served on 12/31/2018, answer due 1/21/2019. (Shufrin, David) |
Filing 9 AO 120 Report on the Filing of an Action re: Patent or Trademark Form Completed (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Hector Alejandro, Finlog SA, Maxi-Press Elastomeric, Inc., Reiner Schmelcher, Voss Laundry Solutions Inc., Wieap Beheer B.V.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *David C. Shufrin and David A. Slossberg* *Hurwitz Sagarin Slossberg & Knuff LLC* *147 North Broad St.* *Milford, CT 06460-0112*. (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #5 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Lavatec Laundry Technology GmbH, #6 Protective Order, #3 Notice of Appearance filed by Lavatec Laundry Technology GmbH, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Lavatec Laundry Technology GmbH Signed by Clerk on 12/27/2018.(Reis, Julia) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by David C. Shufrin on behalf of Lavatec Laundry Technology GmbH (Shufrin, David) |
|
|
|
Judge Janet Bond Arterton added. (Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lavatec Laundry Technology GmbH. (Slossberg, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5097181.), filed by Lavatec Laundry Technology GmbH. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Slossberg, David) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Slossberg, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.