Nordic Group, Inc. v. Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, Inc. et al
| Nordic Group, Inc. |
| Travelers Property Casualty Company of America and Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, Inc. |
| 3:2018mc00118 |
| November 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert N Chatigny |
| Donna F Martinez |
| Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #1 plaintiff's motion to compel absent objection. See D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 7(a)2 ("Failure to submit a memorandum in opposition to a motion may be deemed sufficient cause to grant the motion....") Plaintiff's counsel shall cause a copy of this order to be served on the nonparty Industrial Refrigeration. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 12/4/18. (Constantine, A.)
|
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING re #7 MOTION for Attorney(s) Tara J. Myslinski to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice by Nordic Group, Inc.. (Martin, David) |
| Filing 10 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge Donna F. Martinez: taking under advisement #1 Motion to Compel Subpoena Compliance; Telephonic Motion Hearing held on 11/20/2018 re #1 MOTION to Compel Subpoena Compliance (paid $47 fee; receipt number ACTDC-5042285) filed by Nordic Group, Inc.. Time 12 minutes(Court Reporter J. Brandon.) (Wood, R.) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER denying #5 Motion to Appear ; denying #2 Motion to Appear. The motions are denied as moot in light of ECF No. 8. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 11/19/2018. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Certificate of Good Standing due by 1/18/2019. Signed by Clerk on 11/19/2018. (Murphy, Tatihana)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Attorney(s) Tara J. Myslinski to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice by Nordic Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Ex. A. - Affidavit of Tara Myslinski)(Martin, David) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE AND ORDER: See attached. Telephonic oral argument is scheduled for 11/20/2018 at 11:00 AM before Judge Donna F. Martinez. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the conference call and have counsel for nonparty Industrial Refrigeration on the line when calling chambers at 860 240 3605. (Constantine, A.) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Attorney(s) Tara Myslinski to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice by Nordic Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Tara Myslinski)(Martin, David) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donna F. Martinez for a ruling on #1 MOTION to Compel Subpoena Compliance (paid $47 fee; receipt number ACTDC-5042285). So Ordered by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 11/9/2018.(Pipech, L.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 11/8/2018.(Murphy, Tatihana)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Attorney(s) Tara J. Myslinski to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $75 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-5042360) by Nordic Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Exhibit A to Pro Hac Vice Motion)(Martin, David) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Compel Subpoena Compliance (paid $47 fee; receipt number ACTDC-5042285), filed by Nordic Group, Inc..Responses due by 11/29/2018 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A to Memo in Support, #3 Exhibit B to Memo in Support, #4 Exhibit C to Memo to Support)(Martin, David) |
| Judge Robert N. Chatigny added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
