Lewis v. Southern Connecticut State University et al
Paul E. Lewis |
Christopher M. Piscitelli and Southern Connecticut State University |
3:2019cv00011 |
January 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Alvin W Thompson |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 1/3/2019.(Reis, Julia) |
Filing 7 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 1/3/2019.(Reis, Julia) |
Filing 6 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 3/4/2019 Discovery due by 7/5/2019 Dispositive Motions due by 8/9/2019 Signed by Clerk on 1/3/2019.(Reis, Julia) |
Filing 5 MOTION by Self-Represented Litigant to Participate in Electronic Filing for by Paul E. Lewis. (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 4 Consent to Electronic Notice by Paul E. Lewis (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 3 Appearance Self Represented Party by Paul E. Lewis (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Paul E. Lewis. (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Christopher M. Piscitelli, Southern Connecticut State University, filed by Paul E. Lewis. (Attachments: #1)(Reis, Julia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.