Baldwin v. Connecticut Distributors, Inc
| Bernard Baldwin |
| Connecticut Distributors, Inc |
| 3:2019cv00047 |
| January 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Janet Bond Arterton |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 28
#26 Stipulation of Dismissal is So Ordered. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 2/25/19.(Tooker, A.)
|
|
Filing 27
Order of Dismissal on Report of Settlement. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 2/25/19.(Tooker, A.)
|
| Filing 26 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice by Connecticut Distributors, Inc. (Kirschbaum, Daniel) |
| JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Freberg, B) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER: The parties' joint motion #24 to postpone the pre-filing conference is GRANTED with modification. A telephonic pre-filing conference will be held 2/26/19 at 2:00 p.m. Defense counsel shall initiate the conference call to chambers: 203-773-2737. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 2/12/19. (Davis, Caroline)
|
| Filing 24 MOTION for Extension of Time until March 13, 2019 Pre-Filing Conference currently scheduled for February 13, 2019 19 Order on Motion for Conference, Set Deadlines/Hearings by Connecticut Distributors, Inc. (Kirschbaum, Daniel) |
| Filing 23 CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING re #10 MOTION for Attorney(s) Michele A. Coyne to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $75 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-5118114) by Connecticut Distributors, Inc. (Kirschbaum, Daniel) |
| Filing 22 CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING re #11 MOTION for Attorney(s) Daniel S. Kirschbaum to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $75 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-5118128) by Connecticut Distributors, Inc. (Kirschbaum, Daniel) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Michele A. Coyne on behalf of Connecticut Distributors, Inc (Coyne, Michele) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel S. Kirschbaum on behalf of Connecticut Distributors, Inc (Kirschbaum, Daniel) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #18 Motion for Pre-Filing Conference. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 1/18/19. (Tooker, A.)
|
| A telephonic pre-filing conference will be held 2/13/19 at 11:00 a.m. Defense counsel shall initiate the conference call to chambers: 203-773-2737.(Tooker, A.) |
| Filing 18 MOTION for Pre-Filing Conference re: Motion to Dismiss by Connecticut Distributors, Inc. (Moffett, Rowena) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER denying #14 Motion to Dismiss. without prejudice to renew, for failure to comply with the Court's pre-filing conference requirement. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 1/17/19. (Tooker, A.)
|
| Filing 16 AFFIDAVIT re #14 MOTION to Dismiss , #15 Memorandum in Support of Motion Signed By Michele A. Coyne filed by Connecticut Distributors, Inc. (Moffett, Rowena) |
| Filing 15 Memorandum in Support re #14 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Connecticut Distributors, Inc. (Moffett, Rowena) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss by Connecticut Distributors, Inc.Responses due by 2/6/2019 (Moffett, Rowena) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #11 MOTION for Attorney(s) Daniel S. Kirschbaum to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice. Certificate of Good Standing due by 3/15/2019. Signed by Clerk on 1/14/2019. (Reis, Julia)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 MOTION for Attorney(s) Michele A. Coyne to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice. Certificate of Good Standing due by 3/15/2019. Signed by Clerk on 1/14/2019. (Reis, Julia)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Attorney(s) Daniel S. Kirschbaum to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $75 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-5118128) by Connecticut Distributors, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Moffett, Rowena) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Attorney(s) Michele A. Coyne to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $75 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-5118114) by Connecticut Distributors, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Moffett, Rowena) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #8 Notice, #7 Protective Order, #2 Notice (Other) filed by Connecticut Distributors, Inc, #6 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Notice (Other) filed by Connecticut Distributors, Inc, #5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Connecticut Distributors, Inc, #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Connecticut Distributors, Inc Signed by Clerk on 1/10/2019. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removals)(Reis, Julia) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE re Initial Discovery Protocols Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 1/9/2019. (Attachments: #1 Initial Discovery Protocol Attachment)(Reis, Julia) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 1/9/2019.(Reis, Julia)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 1/9/2019.(Reis, Julia)
|
|
Filing 5
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 3/10/2019 Discovery due by 7/11/2019 Dispositive Motions due by 8/15/2019 Signed by Clerk on 1/9/2019.(Reis, Julia)
|
| Judge Janet Bond Arterton added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Connecticut Distributors, Inc. (Moffett, Rowena) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Connecticut Distributors, Inc of Pending Motions (Moffett, Rowena) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Connecticut Distributors, Inc Statement Regarding A Removed Case (Moffett, Rowena) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Connecticut Distributors, Inc from Superior Court, case number FBT-CV-6081533. Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACTDC-5113655, filed by Connecticut Distributors, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Moffett, Rowena) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Baldwin v. Connecticut Distributors, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bernard Baldwin | |
| Represented By: | John T. Bochanis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Connecticut Distributors, Inc | |
| Represented By: | Rowena Amanda Moffett |
| Represented By: | Daniel S. Kirschbaum |
| Represented By: | Michele A. Coyne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
