Giron v. Bremby
Plaintiff: Christopher Giron
Defendant: Roderick L. Bremby and Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2019cv00075
Filed: January 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Sarah A L Merriam
Referring Judge: Stefan R Underhill
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2019 Filing 13 Social Security Transcripts by Social Security Administration. (Sertial, Heather)
March 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 REMINDER: Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 3/15/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
March 14, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather Sertial on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (Sertial, Heather)
January 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER. In light of plaintiff having filed an #9 Amended Complaint in this action, the Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to email a copy of that pleading to the United States Attorney's Office. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 1/29/2019. (Katz, S.)
January 25, 2019 Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill, filed by Christopher Giron. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(Bozek, M.)
January 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER re: #1 Complaint. On January 15, 2019, plaintiff filed a Complaint for Review of Social Security Administration Decision. (Doc. #1 ). Named as the defendant in that complaint is Roderick L. Bremby. See id. at 1. Roderick L. Bremby is the Commissioner of the State of Connecticut Department of Social Services, and not the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.If plaintiff seeks review of a disability determination by the Social Security Administration, then on or before February 1, 2019, plaintiff should file an amended complaint which substitutes the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Nancy A. Berryhill, for defendant Bremby. If, however, plaintiff seeks relief in connection with a State of Connecticut Department of Social Services decision, then on or before February 1, 2019, plaintiff shall file a notice on the docket stating that information.If it so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 1/17/2019. (Katz, S.)
January 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 . Plaintiff has completed the required information. He asserts that he is unable to afford to pay fees and costs, as he is unemployed, has minimal assets, and receives $645 per month in welfare benefits for a family of four. See generally id. at 3-5. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 1/17/2019. (Katz, S.)
January 16, 2019 Filing 6 Notice to Self-represented Parties. Signed by Clerk on 1/16/2019.(Bozek, M.)
January 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 1/15/2019.(Bozek, M.)
January 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Standing Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 1/15/2019.(Bozek, M.)
January 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Standing Order on Social Security Appeals. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 1/15/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Bozek, M.)
January 15, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Christopher Giron. (Bozek, M.)
January 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Roderick L. Bremby, filed by Christopher Giron.(Bozek, M.)
January 15, 2019 Answer deadline updated for Roderick L. Bremby to 3/16/2019. (Bozek, M.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Giron v. Bremby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Giron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roderick L. Bremby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Heather Sertial
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?