Martin v. A. et al
| Douglas George Martin |
| A. and John Doe |
| 3:2019cv00098 |
| January 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery by Douglas George Martin. (Fanelle, N.) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/18/2019: #1 Envelope) (Fanelle, N.). |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time. The Plaintiff shall identify the Defendants, as previously ordered, on or before March 29, 2019. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 2/21/19. (Dooley, Kari)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery by Douglas George Martin. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by Douglas George Martin (Payton, R.) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER and Order re #2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. Please see attached Order.The Eighth Amendment claim may proceed against both Defendants in their individual capacities for damages. The Fourteenth Amendment claim may proceed against Officer A. in his individual capacity for damages. However, the Court cannot effectuate service on either Defendant because the Plaintiff has not identified them by name or sufficiently descriptive information which would permit the DOC to identify them by name. Thus, the Court will dismiss the case without prejudice. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the Plaintiff must file a notice with the Court indicating the first and last name of both Defendants or, in the alternative, sufficiently descriptive identifying information that would permit the DOC to identify the defendants by name. Failure to file the required notice may result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice.Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 1/29/19.(Dooley, Kari)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 1/28/2018. (Payton, R.)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 01/18/19. (Barry, Donna)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 1/18/19. (Barry, Donna)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 01/18/19. (Barry, Donna)
|
| Filing 3 PRISCS MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Douglas George Martin. (Barry, Donna) |
| Filing 2 PRISCS MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Douglas George Martin. (Barry, Donna) Modified on 2/5/2019 to terminate motion (Gould, K.). |
| Filing 1 PRISCS COMPLAINT against A. and John Doe, filed by Douglas George Martin. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Barry, Donna) Modified text on 1/22/2019 (Barry, Donna). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
