Brown v. Berryhill
| Danny Brown |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2019cv00156 |
| February 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Robert A Richardson |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Robert A. Richardson on 2/11/19.(Blue, A.)
|
| Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Nancy A. Berryhill, Danny Brown. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 2/11/2019.(Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Sixtina Fernandez on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill (Fernandez, Sixtina) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without prepayment of fees, costs or security therefor, which includes an affidavit regarding his current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 . This is plaintiff's second appeal of the Social Security Administration's denial of benefits, and plaintiff has previously been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See Brown v. Berryhill, No. 3:17CV01108(SALM), Doc. #10. In plaintiff's motion in the instant case, he states that he has two dependent children, one of whom is still a minor, and that his family is supported by a single income of approximately $1,000 per week. See Doc. #2 at 2-3. This income does not cover the family's basic monthly expenses. See id. at 3-5. Plaintiff has limited assets and significant debts. See id. at 4. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 2/5/19. (Dowie, C)
|
| Answer deadline updated for Nancy A. Berryhill to 4/5/2019. Service made by Clerk via email. (Anastasio, F.) |
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 2/1/2019.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 6
Standing Scheduling Order Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 2/1/2019.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 5
Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 2/1/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
|
| Filing 4 Notice re: Consent to Magistrate Judge by Danny Brown (Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Ivan Michael Katz on behalf of Danny Brown (Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Danny Brown. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam(Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill, filed by Danny Brown. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Anastasio, F.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
