Pluff v. Berryhill
John Robert Pluff |
Nancy Berryhill |
Social Security Administration |
3:2019cv00238 |
February 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Donna F Martinez |
Sarah A L Merriam |
Stefan R Underhill |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. § 1383 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Nancy Berryhill, John Robert Pluff. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Donna F. Martinez. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 3/21/2019.(Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 7 Notice re: Consent to Magistrate Judge by John Robert Pluff (Anastasio, F.) |
|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Graham Morrison on behalf of Nancy Berryhill (Morrison, Graham) |
Answer deadline updated for Nancy Berryhill to 4/22/2019. (Fazekas, J.) |
|
|
|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5162103.), filed by John Robert Pluff.(Spilka, John) |
Judge Stefan R Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. (Anastasio, F.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.