Miller v. Commissioner of Correction et al
Petitioner: Davon Miller
Respondent: Warden and Commissioner of Correction
Case Number: 3:2019cv00286
Filed: February 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey A Meyer
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE by Commissioner of Correction, Warden re #9 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #8 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus to pro se litigant opposing motion to dismiss (Kutzner, David)
April 26, 2019 Filing 9 Memorandum in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Commissioner of Correction, Warden. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A, #2 Appendix B, #3 Appendix C, #4 Appendix D, #5 Appendix E)(Kutzner, David)
April 26, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Commissioner of Correction, Warden.Responses due by 5/17/2019 (Kutzner, David)
April 16, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Kutzner on behalf of Commissioner of Correction, Warden (Kutzner, David)
February 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: it is hereby ORDERED that the respondent file a response on or before 4/26/19 why the relief prayed for in the #1 petition for writ of habeas corpus should not be granted, and it is ORDERED that the Clerk serve a copy of this order and a copy of the petition and all attachments, to respondents representative, Jo Anne Sulik by email. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 2/28/19.(Pesta, J.)
February 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 2/28/19. (Pesta, J.)
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Prisoner E-Filing Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 2/26/2019.(Pipech, L.)
February 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 2/26/2019.(Pipech, L.)
February 26, 2019 Filing 2 PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Davon Miller. (Attachments: #1 Notice re copies)(Pipech, L.)
February 26, 2019 Filing 1 PRISCS - PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Davon Miller. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Pipech, L.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Commissioner of Correction et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Represented By: David M. Kutzner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Commissioner of Correction
Represented By: David M. Kutzner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Davon Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?