Frew v. 3M Company et al
Jonathan Frew |
Aearo Holding LLC, Aearo, LLC, 3M Company, Aearo Technologies, LLC and Aearo Intermediate, LLC |
3:2019cv00415 |
March 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Stefan R Underhill |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Acknowledgment of Receipt re: Case Transferred Out - Case transferred from Connecticut has been opened in Northern District of Florida as case 3:19-cv-00699, filed 04/17/2019. (Oliver, T.) |
Case electronically transferred to the Northern District of Florida. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 9 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER. Case transferred to the Northern District of Florida. Signed by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the Panel on 4/15/2019. (Oliver, T.) |
JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jonathan Frew. 3M Company served on 3/25/2019, answer due 4/15/2019; Aearo Technologies, LLC served on 3/25/2019, answer due 4/15/2019. (Reardon, Kelly) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jonathan Frew. Aearo Holding LLC served on 3/21/2019, answer due 4/11/2019; Aearo Intermediate, LLC served on 3/21/2019, answer due 4/11/2019; Aearo, LLC served on 3/21/2019, answer due 4/11/2019. (Reardon, Robert) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *3M Company, Aearo Holding LLC, Aearo Intermediate, LLC, Aearo Technologies, LLC, Aearo, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Robert I. Reardon, Jr.* *The Reardon Law Firm* *160 Hempstead St., PO Drawer 1430* *New London, CT 06320*. (Oliver, T.) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Reardon, Robert) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Standing Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Jonathan Frew, #3 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 3/19/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 3/18/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R Underhill on 3/18/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 5/17/2019. Discovery due by 9/17/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 10/22/2019. Signed by Clerk on 3/18/2019.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-5197929.), filed by Jonathan Frew. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reardon, Robert) |
Judge Stefan R Underhill added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.